From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements |
Date: | 2015-09-23 20:41:22 |
Message-ID: | 56030E72.9070104@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/22/15 8:01 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I'm doubtful that this had anything to do with MaxAllocSize. You'd
> certainly need a lot of bloat to be affected by that in any way. I
> wonder how high pg_stat_statements.max was set to on this system, and
> how long each query text was on average.
max was set to 10000. I don't know about average query text size, but
the command that was causing the error was a very large number of
individual INSERT ... VALUES statements all in one command.
The machine had plenty of free memory and no ulimit, so I don't see how
this could have been anything but MaxAllocSize, unless there's some
other failure mode in malloc I don't know about.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-09-23 20:43:12 | Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-23 20:31:45 | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |