Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs
Date: 2015-09-22 19:35:36
Message-ID: 5601AD88.8070103@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/16/15 5:52 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> IMHO the default is the best one at the current time.
> See recovery_min_apply_delay.

The applications of recovery_min_apply_delay are likely to be varied and
specific, so there might not be a general answer to this, but wouldn't
you want hot_standby_feedback on with it? Because the longer you wait
on the standby, the more likely it is that the primary will clean stuff
away.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2015-09-22 19:36:11 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-09-22 19:28:06 Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape