Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work
Date: 2015-09-21 17:30:59
Message-ID: 56003ED3.8040603@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/21/2015 07:36 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-09-21 10:31:17 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> So, where are we with this patch?
>
> Uh. I'd basically been waiting on further review and then forgot about
> it.

Does the current plan to never expire XIDs in 9.6 affect multixact
truncation at all?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-09-21 17:38:40 Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work
Previous Message Jeevan Chalke 2015-09-21 16:37:15 TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected?