Re: There is acid without transactions ?

Sorry my mistake it was 32 minutes. I am confusing with gmail here.

Anyway today is sunday and it is more difficult to have a reply from
community. Anyway thanks.

Ezequias

2007/3/11, Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha <ezequias(dot)rocha(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> Perfect. I just don't know what drivers you are talking about (odbc
> maybe).
>
> More perfect is becouse you answare me in only 1 minute. What community
> don't is ?
>
> Ezequias
>
> 2007/3/11, Jonah H. Harris <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> >
> > On 3/11/07, Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha <ezequias(dot)rocha(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> > > Insert into foo values (1,'Brazil');
> >
> > Assuming you're in psql or using the drivers in autocommit mode, then
> > yes, it's ACID compliant. Individual statements are treated as an
> > implicit transaction unless you create an explicit transaction with
> > BEGIN ... (ROLLBACK | COMIT).
> >
> > Some of the drivers, however, will create an explicit transaction
> > behind-the-scenes if you have autocommit mode disabled.
> >
> > Did that help or was it more confusing?
> >
> > --
> > Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
> > EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
> > 33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> > Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha
> http://ezequiasrocha.blogspot.com/
> use Mozilla Firefox: http://br.mozdev.org/firefox/
>

--
Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha
http://ezequiasrocha.blogspot.com/
use Mozilla Firefox:http://br.mozdev.org/firefox/