Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log
Date: 2023-11-20 13:59:30
Message-ID: 55aa7849-48b9-45df-91d7-80b1948341b9@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/20/23 06:35, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> If we add a message for starting with "backup_label", shouldn't
> we also add a corresponding message for starting from a checkpoint
> found in the control file? If you see that in a problem report,
> you immediately know what is going on.

+1. It is easier to detect the presence of a message than the absence of
one.

Regards,
-David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2023-11-20 14:43:17 Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io
Previous Message David Steele 2023-11-20 13:56:47 Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log