Re: 7.2.1. The FROM Clause

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jochen(dot)bandhauer(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.2.1. The FROM Clause
Date: 2026-06-15 15:24:49
Message-ID: 55a66acaf8bc6a29ed0c553c7e1bbd6639dc0484.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Mon, 2026-06-15 at 11:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > I could not resist the temptation to remove the "now always" in
> > "searching descendant tables is now always the default".  That sounds
> > too much like this was a recent change.
>
> Hmm, phrasing that part that way sounds like it's always been so,
> which is not only false but is contradicted by the surrounding text.
> What do you think of saying
>
>     There is no real reason to use this syntax
>     any more, because searching descendant tables has been the default
>     behavior since PostgreSQL whatever-version-it-was.
>
> I can look up the version where it changed, if this seems like the way
> to go.

I did, and * became obsolete with 7.1. It's even in the release notes.

> I'm also tempted to replace "to use this syntax" with "to write *",
> just to be totally clear which syntax we are referring to.  After
> your rewrite of the prior sentence, someone might think the closest
> antecedent for "this" is "ONLY".

I am fine with both your suggestions.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-06-15 17:14:28 Re: 7.2.1. The FROM Clause
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-06-15 15:05:52 Re: 7.2.1. The FROM Clause