| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | jochen(dot)bandhauer(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 7.2.1. The FROM Clause |
| Date: | 2026-06-15 15:24:49 |
| Message-ID: | 55a66acaf8bc6a29ed0c553c7e1bbd6639dc0484.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, 2026-06-15 at 11:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > I could not resist the temptation to remove the "now always" in
> > "searching descendant tables is now always the default". That sounds
> > too much like this was a recent change.
>
> Hmm, phrasing that part that way sounds like it's always been so,
> which is not only false but is contradicted by the surrounding text.
> What do you think of saying
>
> There is no real reason to use this syntax
> any more, because searching descendant tables has been the default
> behavior since PostgreSQL whatever-version-it-was.
>
> I can look up the version where it changed, if this seems like the way
> to go.
I did, and * became obsolete with 7.1. It's even in the release notes.
> I'm also tempted to replace "to use this syntax" with "to write *",
> just to be totally clear which syntax we are referring to. After
> your rewrite of the prior sentence, someone might think the closest
> antecedent for "this" is "ONLY".
I am fine with both your suggestions.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-06-15 17:14:28 | Re: 7.2.1. The FROM Clause |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-06-15 15:05:52 | Re: 7.2.1. The FROM Clause |