Re: row_security GUC, BYPASSRLS

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: row_security GUC, BYPASSRLS
Date: 2015-09-18 14:27:13
Message-ID: 55FC1F41.4000001@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/18/2015 09:25 AM, Adam Brightwell wrote:
>>> 1. remove row_security=force
>>> 2. remove SECURITY_ROW_LEVEL_DISABLED; make ri_triggers.c subject to policies
>>> 3. add DDL-controlled, per-table policy forcing
>>>
>>> They ought to land in that order. PostgreSQL 9.5 would need at least (1) and
>>> (2); would RLS experts find it beneficial for me to take care of those?
>>
>> That would be awesome, but I would say that if we do #1 & 2 for 9.5, we
>> also need #3.
>
> Agreed. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

Yes, same here.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2015-09-18 14:29:05 Re: tsvector work with citext
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2015-09-18 14:26:40 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add pages deleted from pending list to FSM