Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs
Date: 2015-09-16 20:37:53
Message-ID: 55F9D321.6070904@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/16/15 1:12 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> Also, the documentation claims that this parameter requires a postmaster
>> restart, but the code thinks it's SIGHUP. Which one is wrong?
>
> To which part of the documentation are you referring to? The parameter
> is SIGHUP as I recall and aimed to be such.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/runtime-config-replication.html#GUC-HOT-STANDBY-FEEDBACK

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2015-09-16 20:40:15 Re: Building storage/lwlocknames.h?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-09-16 20:32:51 Re: What is the extent of FDW join pushdown support in 9.5?