Re: Do Layered Views/Relations Preserve Sort Order ?

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Charles Sheridan <cesheri(at)swbell(dot)net>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do Layered Views/Relations Preserve Sort Order ?
Date: 2015-09-14 16:43:45
Message-ID: 55F6F941.4020308@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/9/15 7:55 PM, Charles Sheridan wrote:
>> The better question is how expensive is it to sort already sorted
>> data. If its cheap, and it likely is, then placing explicit sorting
>> where you care is the best solution regardless of your level of
>> confidence that lower level sorting is being maintained.
...

> David, yes, I agree that sorting at the end is the highest-confidence
> approach. I don't (yet) have a large stack of views with an assumption
> of a guaranteed underlying sort order, I'm just trying to get a better
> sense of what Postgres behavior I can reasonably expect here.

BTW, I believe there is some code in the planner to remove useless
ORDER-BYs.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2015-09-14 16:46:51 Re: On-demand running query plans using auto_explain and signals
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-09-14 16:37:01 Re: [PROPOSAL] Covering + unique indexes.