| From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP |
| Date: | 2015-08-26 23:12:54 |
| Message-ID: | 55DE47F6.5000108@proxel.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/26/2015 03:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is it unreasonable of me to ask for the Windows behavior to be fixed at
> the same time? I dunno. It's perhaps less broken than the Unix behavior,
> but that doesn't make it desirable. OTOH it might be a significantly
> larger patch, and I confess I'm not even too sure what we'd have to do.
>
> So I think the way to move this forward is to investigate how to hold
> the SSL config constant until SIGHUP in an EXEC_BACKEND build. If we
> find out that that's unreasonably difficult, maybe we'll decide that
> we can live without it; but I'd like to see the question investigated
> rather than ignored.
I think this is a real concern and one that I will look into, to see if
it can be fixed with a reasonable amount of work.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-08-26 23:31:00 | Re: Our trial to TPC-DS but optimizer made unreasonable plan |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-08-26 22:30:48 | Re: Custom Scans and private data |