Re: BUG #13589: content error

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #13589: content error
Date: 2015-08-25 22:30:30
Message-ID: 55DCEC86.4050401@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 8/25/2015 3:06 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yep, let's fix that.
>
> On 2015-08-25 20:37:43 +0000,barnettluisa(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>> >"Possibly, your site administrator has already created a database for your
>> >use. He should have told you what the name of your database is. In that case
>> >you can omit this step and skip ahead to the next section."
> Maybe: "Possibly, your site administrator has already created a database
> for your use, in which case you should already have been told what the
> name of your database. ..."?

I think thats excessively wordy and contrived. 'They" [1] would be a
perfectly valid usage, but "He" [2] is totally legitimate as the generic
case.

"Possibly, your site administrator has already created a database for your
use. They should have told you what the name of your database is. In that case
you can omit this step and skip ahead to the next section."

references:
[1] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/they
[2] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/he

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-08-25 22:31:24 Re: BUG #13589: content error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-08-25 22:19:54 Re: BUG #13589: content error