Re: Supporting fallback RADIUS server(s)

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Supporting fallback RADIUS server(s)
Date: 2015-08-20 14:28:16
Message-ID: 55D5E400.4090506@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/20/15 4:25 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2015 4:16 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Our expectations about forward compatibility for postgresql.conf entries
>> have always been pretty low; even more so for not-widely-used settings.
>>
>> In any case, wouldn't what you describe simply put off the pain for awhile
>> (replacing it with confusion in the short term)? Eventually we're going
>> to break it.
>>
>
> Well, that's true of any depreciation. And if we throw a log message then
> people will know about it...
>
> That said, I'm not against a clean break with compatibility either. As long
> as it's clean - like renaming the parameters.

All right. I'll submit a patch for that.

Thanks for the input, both.

.m

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2015-08-20 14:28:49 Re: deparsing utility commands
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2015-08-20 14:25:27 Re: Supporting fallback RADIUS server(s)