| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Wayne E(dot) Seguin" <wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |
| Date: | 2015-08-13 16:28:21 |
| Message-ID: | 55CCC5A5.4090103@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 08/13/2015 08:52 AM, Wayne E. Seguin wrote:
> "BDR is only one in Beta compare to stable options:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pooling.
> Not sure why this solution would be chosen. Experience with pgpool is
> that you only needed to change a port and no SQL changes required on an
> application side."
>
> I appreciate any input as to pros/cons of BDR vs PGPool-II v3 in this
BDR is async multi master. PGPool is largely just a connection pooler
with load balancing (although it has other features). They play
different sports.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wayne E. Seguin | 2015-08-13 17:37:43 | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |
| Previous Message | Wayne E. Seguin | 2015-08-13 15:52:41 | [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |