Re: 64-bit XIDs again

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit XIDs again
Date: 2015-07-30 21:29:46
Message-ID: 55BA974A.2080208@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/30/2015 07:24 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> I think we should move to 64-bit XIDs in in-memory structs snapshots,
> proc array etc. And expand clog to handle 64-bit XIDs. But keep the
> xmin/xmax fields on heap pages at 32-bits, and add an epoch-like field
> to the page header so that logically the xmin/xmax fields on the page
> are 64 bits wide, but physically stored in 32 bits. That's possible as
> long as no two XIDs on the same page are more than 2^31 XIDs apart. So
> you still need to freeze old tuples on the page when that's about to
> happen, but it would make it possible to have more than 2^32 XID
> transactions in the clog. You'd never be forced to do anti-wraparound
> vacuums, you could just let the clog grow arbitrarily large

When I introduced the same idea a few years back, having the clog get
arbitrarily large was cited as a major issue. I was under the
impression that clog size had some major performance impacts.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2015-07-30 21:41:44 Re: Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2015-07-30 21:28:50 Re: multivariate statistics / patch v7