Re: A little RLS oversight?

From: Joe Conway <joe(dot)conway(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Yaroslav <ladayaroslav(at)yandex(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A little RLS oversight?
Date: 2015-07-27 17:03:57
Message-ID: 55B6647D.3030102@crunchydata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/26/2015 07:59 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 07/26/2015 07:19 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> Attached is an updated patch (still needs some docs for the functions).
>
> Thanks for that. I'll add the docs.

Documentation added. Also added comment to check_enable_rls about
passing InvalidOid versus GetUserId().

I believe this is ready to go -- any other comments?

Joe

Attachment Content-Type Size
20150727.00-rls-pg-stats.v3.patch text/x-diff 17.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2015-07-27 17:13:34 Re: A little RLS oversight?
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2015-07-27 16:22:42 Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention