Re: compress method for spgist - 2

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: compress method for spgist - 2
Date: 2015-07-23 07:36:04
Message-ID: 55B09964.80707@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/04/2015 06:58 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>> In the original post on this, you mentioned that the PostGIS guys planned to
>> use this to store polygons, as bounding boxes
>> (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5447B3FF.2080406@sigaev.ru). Any idea
>> how would that work?
>
> Poorly, by hanging boxes that straddled dividing lines off the parent
> node in a big linear list. The hope would be that the case was
> sufficiently rare compared to the overall volume of data, to not be an
> issue. Oddly enough this big hammer has worked in other
> implementations at least passable well
> (https://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/blob/branch-7-0/maptree.c#L261)

Ok, I see, but that's not really what I was wondering. My question is
this: SP-GiST partitions the space into non-overlapping sections. How
can you store polygons - which can overlap - in an SP-GiST index? And
how does the compress method help with that?

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-07-23 08:06:50 Re: Idea: closing the loop for "pg_ctl reload"
Previous Message Noah Misch 2015-07-23 06:03:52 Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore