Re: FreeBSD and large shared_buffers a no-go?

From: Kirk Strauser <kirk(at)strauser(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and large shared_buffers a no-go?
Date: 2009-01-07 20:16:29
Message-ID: 55AD5617-E759-426C-874A-54563BE5DF6E@strauser.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Jan 7, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Kirk Strauser <kirk(at)strauser(dot)com> writes:
>> First, shmget is asking for a lot less than shmmax - why is it
>> failing?
>
> Check to see if things work as expected when you have shmmax and
> shmall
> set to a shade less than 2GB and fail when they are a shade more. If
> so, it would seem there's a signed-integer-overflow bug somewhere in
> the
> kernel's handling of shmem requests ... which would be a reportable
> kernel bug.

BTW, that's at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=130274 for
anyone who wants to follow along.
--
Kirk Strauser

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-01-07 20:36:40 Re: stable function called for every row?
Previous Message Gerhard Heift 2009-01-07 20:16:04 Re: stable function called for every row?