Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?

From: cb <cb(at)mythtech(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
Date: 2009-11-16 17:14:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
I've got a pair of servers running PostgreSQL 8.0.4 on Windows. We  
have several tables that add and delete massive amounts of data in a  
single day and are increasingly having a problem with drive  
fragmentation and it appears to be giving us a decent performance hit.  
This is external fragmentation we are dealing with. We already vacuum  
the tables on a regular basis to reduce internal fragmentation as best  
as possible.

Currently I shut down the PostgreSQL service every few weeks and  
manually run a defragment of the drive, but this is getting tedious.  
Diskeeper has an Automatic Mode that runs in the background all the  
time to handle this for me. They advertise they are compatible with MS  
SQL server, but don't appear to have any specific info on PostgreSQL.

I'm curious if anyone else has used Diskeeper's Automatic Mode in  
combination with PostgreSQL to defrag and keep the drive defragged  
while PostgreSQL is actually running.




pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Dave CrookeDate: 2009-11-16 17:44:29
Subject: Re: Unexpected sequential scan on an indexed column
Previous:From: Wayne BeaverDate: 2009-11-16 17:02:05
Subject: Re: Manual vacs 5x faster than autovacs?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group