Re: autovacuum: automatically propagate updated parameters

> On 27 Aug 2026, at 10:37, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> we can stop the
>> second worker at the injection point "vacuum-truncate-enabled" for
>> example. While it works and we can reduce the filler table size, it
>> would add an unclear dependency as vacuum-truncate-enabled is not
>> related to parallel autovacuum.
>
> I added a new injection point and stopped it there in v3. If you think
> that's unnecessary, we can replace it to vacuum-truncate-enabled in
> the test and remove the injection point, and it works the same way.
> This just seemed cleaner to me.

I prefer this approach, injection points are cheap enough that we don't need to
reuse and cause undefined dependencies. I'll try to get this applied later today.

--
Daniel Gustafsson