Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
Date: 2021-10-26 21:48:32
Message-ID: 55A4CF15-D562-4F1F-B078-DAF19A39CBF4@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/26/21, 2:04 PM, "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> Should we just add a builtin function pg_checkpoint(), and deprecate
> the syntax?

That seems reasonable to me.

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2021-10-26 22:08:37 Re: Feature request for adoptive indexes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-10-26 21:39:30 Re: XTS cipher mode for cluster file encryption