Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation
Date: 2015-07-09 14:49:29
Message-ID: 559E89F9.4090504@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 07/09/2015 04:10 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>> Please submit a patch to adjust the treatment of negative integers in the
>>> old functions to be consistent with their treatment in the new functions.
>>> i.e. in the range [-n,-1] they should refer to the corresponding element
>>> counting from the right.
>> This patch is attached, along with a separate patch which adds a
>> release note compatibility item.
> Where are we on this? This is currently a 9.5 release blocker.
>

I am on vacation right now, but I might have some time tomorrow to deal
with it. If not, it will be Sunday or Monday when I get to it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ildus Kurbangaliev 2015-07-09 15:00:19 Re: Waits monitoring
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-07-09 14:26:49 Re: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2015 proposal: Improve the performance of “ALTER TABLE .. SET LOGGED / UNLOGGED” statement