Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?
Date: 2015-06-25 13:15:43
Message-ID: 558BFEFF.6090906@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/25/15 8:03 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Right now if you use streaming rep over ssl, it breaks after a couple
> hundred megabytes with obscure errors.

If it's that bad, then I tend to agree we should turn it off by default.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-06-25 13:19:44 Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-06-25 12:47:22 Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?