| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench - implement strict TPC-B benchmark |
| Date: | 2019-07-30 22:00:18 |
| Message-ID: | 5588.1564524018@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
> [ pgbench-strict-tpcb-2.patch ]
TBH, I think we should reject this patch. Nobody cares about TPC-B
anymore, and they care even less about differences between one
sort-of-TPC-B test and another sort-of-TPC-B test. (As the lack
of response on this thread shows.) We don't need this kind of
baggage in pgbench; it's got too many "features" already.
I'm also highly dubious about labeling this script "standard TPC-B",
when it resolves only some of the reasons why our traditional script
is not really TPC-B. That's treading on being false advertising.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Migowski | 2019-07-30 22:01:09 | AW: Adding column "mem_usage" to view pg_prepared_statements |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-07-30 21:57:58 | Re: Remove HeapTuple and Buffer dependency for predicate locking functions |