Re: pg_receivexlog --create-slot-if-not-exists

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog --create-slot-if-not-exists
Date: 2015-06-19 16:00:39
Message-ID: 55843CA7.8030808@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le 19/06/2015 17:21, Andres Freund a écrit :
> On 2015-06-19 11:19:23 -0400, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>>> * Andres Freund (andres(at)anarazel(dot)de) wrote:
>>>> To make slot usage in pg_receivexlog easier, should we add
>>>> --create-slot-if-not-exists? That'd mean you could run the same command
>>>> the first and later invocation.
>>>
>>> Yes, please.
>>
>> +1.
>
> Arguably we could do that for 9.5 - the whole slot stuff for receivexlog
> is new, and this is just adjusting the API slightly. I won't fight much
> for that opinion though.

+1 for it in 9.5

--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-19 16:00:46 Re: Auto-vacuum is not running in 9.1.12
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-19 15:52:55 backend depends on libpgport but Make doesn't know