Re: PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions

From: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>
To: "Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth" <gunnar(dot)bluth(at)pro-open(dot)de>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions
Date: 2015-06-13 05:08:37
Message-ID: 557BBAD5.2020005@Sheeky.Biz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 12/06/2015 19:23, Gunnar "Nick" Bluth wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 12.06.2015 um 11:26 schrieb damien clochard:
>>
>> https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/node/143842
>>
> You just have to love public corporations... RATP asks for RHEL 5.4
> and Postgres 8.4.10 (if I read that correctly).

Don't forget the windows XP clients and the experience with php 5.1.6,
apache 2.0, tomcat 5.5, jonas 4.5.3, Oracle 9.2 or postgresql 8.1 they
want with your references.

They list each application with their own server specs, RHEL ranges
from 5.2 to 6.5 while postgresql ranges from 8.4.10 to 8.4.16.
They do have one RHEL 6.5 running postgresql 9.3

As they are asking for maintenance I would fail to mention your ability
to convince management to upgrade software when you apply.

;-)

--

Shane Ambler
pgSQL (at) Sheeky (dot) Biz

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-06-13 20:37:28 Re: PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-06-12 18:00:40 Re: Hot features for 9.5 beta