From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Apt & Downloads page |
Date: | 2015-06-12 18:43:53 |
Message-ID: | 557B2869.9010204@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 06/12/2015 04:05 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2015 6:10 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
> <mailto:jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/11/2015 02:52 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>
>>> those commands into a script and execute a script.
>>>
>>> So what would actually be required to use apt-add-repository? Does it
>>> require some extra metadata to be published, or is it just about the
>>> instructions themselves? If so,what should they be for Ubuntu?
>>
>>
>> Here is the verbiage on it:
>>
>> http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/trusty/man1/add-apt-repository.1.html
>>
>> Looks like we could have a ppa, that ppa I assume would just have all
> the information point to the community servers (versus landscape) or we
> can also use the command line options to add the repo directly or both.
>
> Pretty sure ppa requires it to be on launchpad, no?
>
> And afaict it doesn't handle the signing keys for other repos? If so, I
> don't really see the gain with having it, since we'd still need multiple
> steps?
yeah not sure I see that one as an improvment either - unless I'm
missing something ....
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-06-12 19:28:22 | Re: Apt & Downloads page |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-06-12 18:33:38 | Re: Apt & Downloads page |