Re: Strange error related to temporary tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strange error related to temporary tables
Date: 2006-09-01 16:08:47
Message-ID: 5579.1157126927@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> writes:
>> Is this xmin quite a bit older than what you get for a freshly-created
>> temp table?

> I would say yes, this is a test system which is highly stressed from
> time to time, but does not get continuous load.

OK, so it seems we have an old pg_type entry that for some reason was
not dropped when the owning table was dropped. Weird. As you know,
we've seen one report of this before.

There's probably not much more we can learn at this point --- given
that the entry is old, any other evidence is probably long gone.
I'd suggest just doing a manual DELETE of that pg_type row to get out
of the problem.

And yes, you ought to update that 8.1.0 installation ;-). But I have
no idea if this problem is related to any solved bugs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Terry Lee Tucker 2006-09-01 16:12:31 Sharing News
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2006-09-01 16:03:11 Re: Thought provoking piece on NetBSD