Re: Bug in 8.2B1 plpgsql ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: James Robinson <jlrobins(at)socialserve(dot)com>
Cc: Hackers Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in 8.2B1 plpgsql ...
Date: 2006-10-25 22:12:10
Message-ID: 5574.1161814330@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

James Robinson <jlrobins(at)socialserve(dot)com> writes:
> Seems that plpgsql in 8.2B1 thinks that selects of the form ' ....
> and foo not in (select ... )' should be function calls, not
> subselects. These worked fine in 8.1.

Fixed, thanks. It's not actually plpgsql's fault ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-25 22:15:25 Re: Out of memory error causes Abort, Abort tries to allocate memory
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-25 21:46:33 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition