Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I have just been trapped by the fact that in some code paths we look
> at the RMGR information of a WAL record (record->xl_info) but the
> filter dedicated to it, ~XLR_INFO_MASK, is not applied. This is
> harmful now, but this could lead to problems if in the future new
> record-level flags, similar to XLR_SPECIAL_REL_UPDATE, are added.
> Disclaimer: I am looking at a patch where a record-level flag makes
> sense, still this looks like a separate problem.
> What about the patch attached to make things more consistent?
Grepping found a couple of additional places that needed the same
fix. Pushed with those additions.
regards, tom lane