| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |
| Date: | 2016-05-21 15:45:38 |
| Message-ID: | 55675.1463845538@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 5/20/16 7:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I guess my first question is whether we have consensus on the release
>> into which we should put this. Some people (Noah, among others)
>> thought it should wait because we're after feature freeze, while
>> others thought we should do it now. If we're going to try to get this
>> into 9.6, I'll work on reviewing this sooner rather than later, but if
>> we're not going to do that I'm going to postpone dealing with it until
>> after we branch.
> Sounds to me that this is part of the cleanup of a 9.6 feature and
> should be in that release.
Yes, let's fix it. This will also take care of the questions about
whether the GIN/GIST opclass tweaks I made a few months ago require
module version bumps.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-21 15:48:40 | Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand |
| Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2016-05-21 15:44:09 | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |