From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Run pgindent now? |
Date: | 2015-05-24 14:07:05 |
Message-ID: | 5561DB09.8010201@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/23/2015 11:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 04:16:07AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> - if (IsA(node, Aggref) || IsA(node, GroupingFunc))
>>> + if (IsA(node, Aggref) ||IsA(node, GroupingFunc))
>>>
>>> There's a bunch of changes like this. Looks rather odd to me? I don't
>>> recall seing much code looking like that?
>> Wow, that is quite odd.
> No, pgindent has *always* been wonky about lines that contain a typedef
> name but are not variable declarations. I've gotten in the habit of
> breaking IsA tests like these into two lines:
>
> if (IsA(node, Aggref) ||
> IsA(node, GroupingFunc))
>
> just so that it doesn't look weird when pgindent gets done with it.
> You can see similar weirdness around sizeof usages, if you look.
Well, that sounds like something we should try to patch, doesn't it?
(No, I'm not volunteering.)
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-24 14:44:10 | Re: Run pgindent now? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-05-24 12:31:32 | Re: Run pgindent now? |