From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PGBuildFarm <pgbuildfarm-members(at)pgfoundry(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?) |
Date: | 2015-05-18 10:33:27 |
Message-ID: | 5559BFF7.4060601@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | buildfarm-members |
That's very odd.
LWP has been a requirement from Day 1 of the buildfarm. It's what's used
to load the results to the server. There have been special
considerations for older Msys systems, so that you run the main script
with Msys perl, which used not to have LWP, and the web script with
ActivePerl, which does, but that shouldn't apply on Solaris.
cheers
andrew
On 05/18/2015 04:57 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> Casteroides and protosciurus appear to be stuck as the most recent
> update to the BF code now seems to want the LWP perl module, which
> wasn't installed. I've added that - will see if they recover.
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The following buildfarm members haven't reported on HEAD in more than a
>> week:
>>
>> tick
>> leech
>> markhor
>> stilt
>> protosciurus
>> castoroides
>>
>> Several of these are using CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, and are probably stuck
>> because of the plpython bug Peter E. introduced awhile back. That is
>> believed to be fixed now, but you'll probably have to manually kill the
>> current run to get it unstuck.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pgbuildfarm-members mailing list
>> Pgbuildfarm-members(at)lists(dot)pgfoundry(dot)org
>> http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgbuildfarm-members
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2015-05-18 10:40:58 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?) |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2015-05-18 08:57:56 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?) |