| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: multixacts woes |
| Date: | 2015-05-11 20:32:02 |
| Message-ID: | 555111C2.7070207@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/11/2015 10:24 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> In terms of adding a new GUC in 9.5: can't we take a stab at auto-tuning
> this instead of adding a new GUC? We already have a bunch of freezing
> GUCs which fewer than 1% of our user base has any idea how to set.
That is a documentation problem not a user problem. Although I agree
that yet another GUC for an obscure "feature" that should be internally
intelligent is likely the wrong direction.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-05-11 21:00:13 | Multi-xacts and our process problem |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-11 20:00:00 | Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option |