Re: problem with self built postgres 9.0.9

From: Gabriele Bulfon <gbulfon(at)sonicle(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: problem with self built postgres 9.0.9
Date: 2020-06-01 08:07:29
Message-ID: 555076151.2583.1590998849684@www
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I will consider the upgrade, thanks a lot!
Gabriele
 
 
Sonicle S.r.l. 

http://www.sonicle.com
Music: 
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics : 
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
Da:
David G. Johnston
A:
Gabriele Bulfon
Cc:
Adrian Klaver
pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org
Data:
29 maggio 2020 16.18.44 CEST
Oggetto:
Re: problem with self built postgres 9.0.9
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 7:08 AM Gabriele Bulfon
gbulfon(at)sonicle(dot)com
wrote:
Amazing! Rebuilt without -O and it worked like a charm!
Thanks, at the moment I need to stick to 9.0.9 on this machine to be able to reuse the same database files.
 
 
Just to be thorough.  You can update to 9.0.23 (i.e., build against the tip of the 9.0.x set of branches) and still use the same database files.  For all versions (starting with v10 the version has only two components, not three) changing the final digit in the version is a code-only change.
 
There is no material difference to risk for building 9.0.23 against the newer O/S and compiler, etc, than it is to build 9.0.9 against the newer O/S and compiler, etc.  You assumed basically maximum risk when you choose to keep using version 9.0 and upgraded everything else around it to versions that were possibly never tested against it - and if they were tested it is more likely they were tested against 9.0.23 as it is years more current.
 
David J.
 

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrus 2020-06-01 08:17:19 Re: How to start slave after pg_basebackup. Why min_wal_size and wal_keep_segments are duplicated
Previous Message Bernhard Beroun 2020-06-01 08:02:12 Vanishing unique constraint