Re: "Bugs" CF?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Bugs" CF?
Date: 2015-05-08 01:15:36
Message-ID: 554C0E38.6060608@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/7/15 9:44 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> a) make sure we don't lose track of bug-fix patches
> b) make it clear where bug-fix patches should be submitted
> c) provide a view of bug-fix patches for people to look at outside of
> CF time
> d) continue to have a single view which includes all active patches
> with bug fixes listed first

I think these goals are valid, but are adequately served by the current
setup.

I think having a separate bucket for bugs would just lead to lots of
discussions over what qualifies as a bug.

In response to

  • "Bugs" CF? at 2015-05-07 13:44:05 from Stephen Frost

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-05-08 01:19:32 Re: when are the xxxin() functions called
Previous Message Amit Langote 2015-05-08 01:08:34 Re: when are the xxxin() functions called