Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2)

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2)
Date: 2015-04-28 15:17:11
Message-ID: 553FA477.5010803@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/28/15 2:14 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:23 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>> I've also added some checking to make sure that if anything looks funny
>> on the stack an error will be generated.
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback!
>>
>
> Thank you for updating the patch!
> I ran the postgres regression test on database which is enabled
> pg_audit, it works fine.
> Looks good to me.
>
> If someone don't have review comment or bug report, I will mark this
> as "Ready for Committer".

Thank you! I appreciate all your work reviewing this patch and of
course everyone else who commented on, reviewed or tested the patch
along the way.

--
- David Steele
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2015-04-28 15:20:26 Re: Proposal: knowing detail of config files via SQL
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2015-04-28 15:12:11 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues