Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
Date: 2015-04-17 18:19:48
Message-ID: 55314EC4.4010405@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/17/2015 09:02 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I'm slightly surprised that Heikki now wants
> to use an infomask2 bit (if that is what you mean),

No, I don't.

> because he wanted to preserve those by doing the MagicOffsetNumber
> thing.

Yes, that's the way to go.

Glad we cleared that up :-).

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-04-17 18:33:27 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2015-04-17 18:19:19 Re: Relation extension scalability