| From: | Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performance\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gabrielle Roth" <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5 |
| Date: | 2008-12-21 09:29:46 |
| Message-ID: | 552F108E-9732-4ED6-B45D-6C651C63565E@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Dec 20, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> To recap, dbt2 is a fair-use derivative of the TPC-C benchmark. We
>> are using a 1000 warehouse database, which amounts to about 100GB of
>> raw text data.
>
> Really? Do you get conforming results with 1,000 warehouses? What's
> the 95th
> percentile response time?
No, the results are not conforming. You and others have pointed that
out already. The 95th percentile response time are calculated on each
page of the previous links.
I find your questions a little odd for the input I'm asking for. Are
you under the impression we are trying to publish benchmarking
results? Perhaps this is a simple misunderstanding?
Regards,
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefano Dal Pra | 2008-12-21 10:15:12 | Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-12-21 08:51:19 | Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle |