Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle

From: "Stefano Dal Pra" <s(dot)dalpra(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Victor Nawothnig" <victor(dot)nawothnig(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle
Date: 2008-12-21 10:15:12
Message-ID: 290a5abc0812210215v37422279t82ff705351870673@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

One year ago a Postgres teacher pointed me there:

http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/database-soup/postgresql-publishes-first-real-benchmark-17470
http://www.spec.org/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q3/jAppServer2004-20070606-00065.html

that would be just like what you're looking for.

Regards,
Stefano

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Victor Nawothnig
<victor(dot)nawothnig(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for some recent and hopefully genuine comparisons between
> Oracle and PostgreSQL regarding their performance in large scale
> applications. Tests from real world applications would be preferable
> but not required. Also differentiations in different areas (i.e.
> different data types, query structures, clusters, hardware, etc.)
> might be helpful as well.
>
> I don't trust the results that Google gives me.
>
> Regards,
> Victor Nawothnig
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Carey 2008-12-21 20:08:36 Query planner plus partitions equals very bad plans, again
Previous Message Mark Wong 2008-12-21 09:29:46 Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5