Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "G(dot) Anthony Reina" <reina(at)nsi(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum
Date: 1999-08-13 18:09:01
Message-ID: 5526.934567741@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> As far as I recall, the only error message he has listed so far is from
> psql, which merely records the unlink failure at the end of the vacuum.
> Everything else looks remarkably like the vc_abort bug.

But the vc_abort problem didn't cause a backend coredump --- it just
reported an error and failed to complete the vacuum, no?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 1999-08-13 18:28:31 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 1999-08-13 18:04:43 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum