Re: pg_restore -t should match views, matviews, and foreign tables

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore -t should match views, matviews, and foreign tables
Date: 2015-04-07 20:19:07
Message-ID: 55243BBB.4040208@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/31/15 11:01 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Following on from this -bugs post:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMsr+YGJ50TvTVK4Dbp66gAjeOC0KaP6KXFEHAOM+neQmHvoQA@mail.gmail.com
>
> this patch adds support for views, foreign tables, and materialised
> views to the pg_restore -t flag.

I think this is a good change. Any concerns?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2015-04-07 20:23:54 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-04-07 20:11:09 Re: Row security violation error is misleading