Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app
Date: 2015-04-07 19:35:31
Message-ID: 55243183.70200@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/7/15 3:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I tried to mark the "UPDATE SET (*)" patch as "returned with feedback",
> but the CF app informed me that if I did that the patch would
> automatically be moved to the next commitfest. That seems completely
> stupid. There is no need to reconsider it unless a new version of the
> patch is forthcoming (which there may or may not ever be, but that's
> beside the point for now). When and if the author does submit a new
> patch, that would be the time to include it in the next commitfest, no?

I noticed that as well and have avoided closing some patches because of it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-04-07 19:41:57 Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-04-07 19:33:38 "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app