| From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove traces of long in dynahash.c |
| Date: | 2025-08-20 23:43:49 |
| Message-ID: | 5513A5B1-090C-4B05-8981-C8224AB78C45@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Michael,
> On Aug 21, 2025, at 07:07, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
>
> After sleeping on it, I am not sure what to do with these routines. I
> don't deny that more refactoring can be done. However, all that can
> also happen outside the long -> int64 switch I am suggesting.
>
> Any comments from others?
> --
> Michael
I don’t want to block you. Unless others have the same comment about naming, you can go ahead and move forward. I agree further refactoring can belong to a separate commit.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mihail Nikalayeu | 2025-08-20 23:44:00 | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-08-20 23:12:36 | Re: VM corruption on standby |