| From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication identifiers, take 4 |
| Date: | 2015-03-24 21:22:29 |
| Message-ID: | 5511D595.3060207@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24/03/15 16:33, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's the next version of this patch. I've tried to address the biggest
> issue (documentation) and some more. Now that both the more flexible
> commit WAL record format and the BKI_FORCE_NOT_NULL thing is in, it
> looks much cleaner.
>
Nice, I see you also did the more close integration with CommitTs. I
only skimmed the patch but so far and it looks quite good, I'll take
closer look around end of the week.
>
> I'd greatly appreciate some feedback on the documentation. I'm not
> entirely sure into how much detail to go; and where exactly in the docs
> to place it. I do wonder if we shouldn't merge this with the logical
> decoding section and whether we could also document commit timestamps
> somewhere in there.
Perhaps we should have some Logical replication developer documentation
section and put all those three as subsections of that?
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-03-24 21:27:50 | Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-03-24 21:22:11 | Re: parallel mode and parallel contexts |