| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GSoC 2015: Extra Jsonb functionality |
| Date: | 2015-03-23 20:59:01 |
| Message-ID: | 55107E95.6070000@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/21/15 12:49 PM, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > Frankly, I think the whole proposal needs to be rethought with an eye
> towards supporting and preserving nested elements instead of trying to
> just flatten everything out.
>
> Can you pls show me few examples what do you mean exactly?
All the comments others have made in this thread, for starters.
Your proposal seems intent on completely flattening all JSON documents,
or treating them as if they were flat. I see zero chance of that being
accepted.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-03-23 21:03:04 | Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-03-23 20:42:38 | Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option? |