Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?
Date: 2015-03-21 19:31:38
Message-ID: 550DC71A.7050007@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 03/20/2015 04:09 PM, Robert Haas wrote:

> Thus far, the rule for postgresql.conf has been that pretty much
> everything goes in there, and that's a defensible position. Other
> reasonable options would be to ship the file with a small handful of
> settings in it and leave everything else, or to ship it completely
> empty of comments with only those settings that initdb sets and
> nothing else. I'd be OK a coherent policy change in this area, but
> just removing one or two setting seems like it will be confusing
> rather than helpful.

I would agree with this. I imagine there is only about a dozen, dozen
and a half that need to be there by default.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc

Now I get it: your service is designed for a customer
base that grew up with Facebook, watches Japanese seizure
robot anime, and has the attention span of a gnat.
I'm not that user., "Tyler Riddle"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-03-21 19:32:08 Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2015-03-21 19:14:30 Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?