| From: | Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Samsung SSD 850 PRO 1T : any good for PostgreSQL? |
| Date: | 2015-03-13 17:05:04 |
| Message-ID: | 550318C0.90808@matrix.gatewaynet.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 13/03/2015 18:01, Fernando Hevia wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Ryan Thompson <agyant(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:agyant(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Personally, I'd steer clear of Samsung desktop SSDs for anything mission-critical. I've seen them get ripped apart by standard SATA controllers as well as LSI MegaRAID. My rule of thumb is
> Samsung is okay as long as we're using RAID 1.
>
> For data loss, pick up a RAID controller card with BBU or capacitor-based cache protection. That way, in the event of a total power failure, the data integrity is maintained and simply continues
> writing to disk once power is restored.
>
>
> I am afraid that won't suffice. The HD will signal the controller that the data has been committed safely - which we know is not the case - and the controller cache data would be discarded to make
> room for new blocks.
>
>
People,
thanks a lot for all your replies. I just hope I won't have to send the next message in this list in full panic mode.
--
Achilleas Mantzios
Head of IT DEV
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aniko Belim | 2015-03-13 21:26:00 | standby parallel backup |
| Previous Message | Fernando Hevia | 2015-03-13 16:01:45 | Re: Samsung SSD 850 PRO 1T : any good for PostgreSQL? |