| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Phil Currier <pcurrier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: logical column ordering |
| Date: | 2015-03-12 19:45:25 |
| Message-ID: | 5501ECD5.4040705@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/11/15 10:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think using an OID would break more stuff than it fixes in dependency
> tracking; in particular you would now need an explicit dependency link
> from each column to its table, because the "sub-object" knowledge would
> no longer work.
That might not be a bad thing, but ...
> In any case this patch is going to be plenty big enough
> already without saddling it with a major rewrite of the dependency system.
... is true.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-03-12 19:48:00 | Re: Turning off HOT/Cleanup sometimes |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-03-12 19:44:50 | Re: logical column ordering |