From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: disallow operator "=>" and use it for named parameters |
Date: | 2015-03-10 16:07:56 |
Message-ID: | 54FF16DC.1040009@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/03/15 17:01, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> 2015-03-10 16:50 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>>:
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>>
> writes:
>
> > Committed with a few documentation tweaks.
>
> Was there any consideration given to whether ruleutils should start
> printing NamedArgExprs with "=>"? Or do we think that needs to wait?
>
>
> I didn't think about it? I don't see any reason why it have to use
> deprecated syntax.
>
There is one, loading the output into older version of Postgres. Don't
know if that's important one though.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-03-10 16:11:57 | Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-03-10 16:07:29 | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position |