| From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |
| Date: | 2015-03-10 00:37:02 |
| Message-ID: | 54FE3CAE.5000005@proxel.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/07/2015 07:18 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> What I am wondering is if those numeric_int16_* functions that also deal
> with either the Int128AggState or NumericAggState should be renamed in
> similar fashion.
Here is a patch where I have renamed the functions.
int128-agg-v7.patch
- Rename numeric_int16_* to numeric_poly_*
- Rename static functions int{8,16}_to_numericvar to
int{64,128}_to_numericvar
- Fix typo in c-compile.m4 comment
--
Andreas Karlsson
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| int128-agg-v7.patch | text/x-patch | 38.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-03-10 00:57:50 | Re: New functions |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-03-10 00:34:52 | Re: Documentation of bt_page_items()'s ctid field |